Re: [lwip-users] ping out?

[Ed Sutter]

Florian,
I've been using the BSD API exclusively, and haven't had any trouble
with it.  I chose lwIP because I know it gives me both options.  At
the moment I am working on systems that do not require me to strip out
the BSD API, but knowing that I can do that is what makes lwIP quite
attractive.
Ed

"Zschocke, Florian" wrote:
> 
> Kieran Mansley wrote on Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2003 16:37:
> 
> > So, what do other people think?
> >
> > On one side we have SOCK_RAW:
> > [...]
> > On the other side we have the callback method done by Larry:
> > [...]
> 
> This raises another question I was wondering about: who of the lwIP users is
> using the raw API, who is using the lwIP API and who is using the BSD socket
> API? Given the current state of the BSD API I would think that not many
> people use lwIP with the BSD API. In our system we interface lwIP with the
> BSD API.
> 
> We have a SOCK_RAW implementation, more or less modelled after the UDP
> system in lwIP. It has been tested with a Ping application and will be used
> to run OSPF over it. As always I am willing to try and make a patch for it.
> This might take a bit time since we have also modified our lwIP for other
> things (like IP_RECVIF support, but without recvmsg()) and it contains extra
> code special to our system.
> 
> Florian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users