Re: [lwip-users] Re: bug fix

[K.J. Mansley]

On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 23:55, Bill Knight wrote:

>     while (pcb->unsent != NULL &&
>            TCP_SEQ_LEQ(ntohl(pcb->unsent->tcphdr->seqno) + 
> TCP_TCPLEN(pcb->unsent), ackno) &&
>            TCP_SEQ_LEQ(ackno, pcb->snd_max)
>            /*TCP_SEQ_BETWEEN(ackno, ntohl(pcb->unsent->tcphdr->seqno) + 
> TCP_TCPLEN(pcb->unsent), pcb->snd_max)*/
> 
> So far I have been unable to determine why in this instance the macro
> does not work.  Maybe something to do with LITTLE_ENDIAN.  Maybe
> another set of eyes can spot it.

Logically, I think it should be fine, but I could have missed
something.  I would be useful if we can work out it this problem is
restricted to this compiler, or if it's more widespread.  So, has anyone
else seen problems with this change, and if so, what compiler are you
using?

Thanks

Kieran