[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving
From: |
Craig Graham |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:33:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6 |
On Monday 11 October 2004 13:53, Atte Kojo wrote:
> This way a duplicate ack is sent only when the senders window is empty.
> I can't tell how it behaves with small chunks of continuous data, but
> with bursts of large chunks it works pretty well. Someone with a
> different kind of an environment might like to test it also.
I ran the same test on this patch as I ran my previous patch - the result is
shown in the table below:
Stock 1.0.0 (with cvs mods) 74s 100% (baseline)
tcp_recved() mod (Craig version) 29s 255%
tcp_recved() mod (Atte version) 37s 200%
ie. It's performance isn't as good as the patch I posted yesterday. Don't
suppose anyone else fancies running a few TCP performance tests to confirm
this?
Laters,
Craig.
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/10
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving,
Craig Graham <=
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/16
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Sigurd Vindenes, 2004/10/27