[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL
From: |
Mumtaz Ahmad |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:44:01 +0500 |
Well probably i quoted it wrong . Infact I have implemented BSD style API
that are much simpler than lwip BSD layer but they do require a
multithreading environment for sure. These API use simple thread safe
mechanism instead of lwip message boxes. The system is yet in testing .
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Lentvorski" <address@hidden>
To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL
> Mumtaz Ahmad wrote:
> > Dear Simons
> >
> > Thats a better way and i have also used it and created my own sequential
> > APIs using this locking mechanism .This helped me to get a BSD style
socket
> > api with the approximate performance of raw api .
>
> Do you have code available to share about this?
>
> A BSD-style API which does not require a threading system would be a
> nice addition to lwIP.
>
> -a
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Leon Woestenberg, 2006/11/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Leon Woestenberg, 2006/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Christiaan Simons, 2006/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Mumtaz Ahmad, 2006/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Andrew Lentvorski, 2006/11/18
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL,
Mumtaz Ahmad <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Andrew Lentvorski, 2006/11/20
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Kieran Mansley, 2006/11/19
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Leon Woestenberg, 2006/11/19
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/19
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/19
- RE: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Pettinato, Jim, 2006/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Jonathan Larmour, 2006/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL, Peter Graf, 2006/11/18