[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwip error compilation edk 8.2i
From: |
Jonathan Larmour |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwip error compilation edk 8.2i |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:12:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.fc3.4.legacy (X11/20060515) |
Louis Filasky wrote:
Hello,
I've been working on a project for a few week now and new to
lwip/fpga/edk. We have to send some data to a Virtex II Pro (XUP-V2P)
and we first used the EMAC IP core
provided along with EDK8.2i. It worked well even though we've heard of
lwip which is implementing DHCP which is required for our project.
For a couple of days, we have been trying to make it compile on EDK but
we were unsuccessful.
We get the following error when we try to compile the lwip 1.0a (but not
with the lwip 2.0a):
/*bash -c "cd src;make all >& logs"*/
*//*
That's not an error, that's saying what command was trying to be run. If
it was that command that failed, the answer depends on what the real error
was, but I fancy the chances there is no makefile there. Makefiles are up
to ports, and the Virtex port in that EDK is supplied by them, not the
lwIP project. You'll have to take this issue up with them.
Also, I was wondering what is the different between lwip 2.0a and 1.0a,
is one a standalone raw api and the other built on some kind of mini-os?
Finally, one last question, is it possible to install the last lwip
1.2.0 on edk?
Since lwip 2.0 does not yet exist, and I have no time machine handy at the
moment, I have no idea what the differences are. An explanation is that
whoever supplied that EDK is just making up version numbers, and those
don't correspond to lwIP releases in the public project. Again, the best
thing to do is take this up with them.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["The best things in life aren't things."]------ Opinions==mine