RE : [lwip-users] (no subject)

[Frédéric BERNON]

Last, if this is your problem, take a look to 
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?7490 (task #7490 : Add return value to 
sys_mbox_post).
 
  
====================================
Frédéric BERNON 
HYMATOM SA 
Chef de projet informatique 
Microsoft Certified Professional 
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 
Email : address@hidden 
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr 
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
 


-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Andrew Lukefahr
Envoyé : mercredi 5 décembre 2007 05:31
À : Mailing list for lwIP users
Objet : [lwip-users] (no subject)


Hi,

I'm trying to use the sequential API to read and write to several sockets 
simultaneously.  I'm using FreeRTOS on an AT91SAM7X256 and a fairly recent(~1 
month ago) cvs version of lwip.  I'm trying to read in data over several 
connections, parse out the useful data, and then send data back out over 
several other connections.  The incoming connections are only used for incoming 
data, and the outgoing connections are only used for outgoing data.  None of 
the streams have much data flowing though them, at most ~1KB/s.

I got it working pretty consistently with 3 incoming connections and 1-5 
outgoing connections.  I found out I had to put a ~150ms delay on the output 
loop in my write thread, otherwise lwip would lock up.  However, now I need to 
add a fourth incoming connection.  With the addition of the 4th incoming 
connection, lwip works for anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes before 
locking up.  It seems the more outgoing connections that lwip is trying to 
service, the quicker the lockup, however, even if there aren't any outgoing 
connections, eventually lwip will still lock up.  I've been playing around with 
debugging, and so far I cant find anything that stands out.  The last few lines 
of my debug look like this...

LWIP:     tcp_receive: window update 1052
LWIP:     tcp_receive: dupack averted 77772192 77772083
LWIP:     tcp_receive: pcb->rttest 0 rtseq 6509 ackno 6510
... then there is a long pause, followed by....
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool PBUF_POOL

So, a few questions.  First, I know that lwip isn't thread safe. 
However, I'm wondering what I need to control with a semaphore or mutex.  I've 
got 4 different recv functions in 4 different threads, and a single write 
thread.  So I can't block for each one, otherwise only one can be blocked in 
recv at a time, and it will have to timeout if there isnt any data, which will 
take too long. Also, do I need to try to serialize lwip if I'm only using each 
netconn for one directional data
flow?   (If each netconn is only being used for sending OR receiving,
not both )

Second, I assume that something is going wrong in netconn_recv().  I'm also 
guessing that as it works fine with three recv's, but locks up with four, it is 
mostly likely overwhelming a buffer with incoming data.  So, my question is 
what buffer(s) should I look at increasing to see if that helps?

Or is there something I'm missing?  Any debugging recommendations to help nail 
down whats causing the error?

I can post my lwipopts.h and and send/recv code if anyone thinks that will help.


Oh, and on a completely unrelated question, if FreeRTOS implements malloc and 
free as pvPortMalloc and vPortFree, what would I need to modify in lwip to get 
it to use FreeRTOS memory instead of its own?  I assume I would need to define 
MEM_LIBC_MALLOC correctly, and redefine mem_malloc and mem_free in mem.h?

Thanks


-- 
Andrew Lukefahr
address@hidden

Electrical and Computer Engineering
Univeristy of Missouri

Open Source, Open Minds

Frédéric BERNON.vcf
Description: Frédéric BERNON.vcf