lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:RE : [lwip-users] (no subject)


From: embed9527
Subject: Re:RE : [lwip-users] (no subject)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:51:46 +0800 (CST)

 
I set the maximal number of the message for a mbox to 2, so that it can be full easy.
In the funtion sys_mbox_post, I set a counter, when it bigger than a maximal number(such as 10), the funtion return viod. I'm test the system, and look into from the debug information. I find my board died sometime, the stack does debug information anymore, I guess ARM is in the Data Abort Interrupt.
 
Notice I just return void in the funtion sys_mbox_post, is it any error?
 

在2007-12-05,"Frédéric BERNON" <address@hidden> 写道:
Your problem is perhaps that tcpip_thread is blocked somewhere, which explains that your driver can post new input packets, because tcpip_thread doesn't fetch them (or too slowly). That's why you got "memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT". One of the main cause of tcpip_thread blocking is it have to post pbuf or netbuf to netconn::recvmbox. Since it is actually asked that sys_mbox_post was blocking, perhaps the problem is that in one of your incoming connections, netconn::recvmbox become full between the time where the application thread fetch a packet and try to call do_recv. If at this time, tcpip_thread got a new packet to post to this netconn::recvmbox, it block waiting some free spaces, but this space will never be freed since the application thread wants that tcpip_thread execute a do_recv before => deadlock.
 
This is a possible explain of your problem. Perhaps there could be some other problem in another place. But if it's this problem, try to increase your mbox size to a higher value (like this, in the worth case, your will got a "out of memory" of your PBUF_POOL, and since this packet will be droped, tcp source will resend it). Of course, I suppose your mboxes have a fixed size too low.

Hope it's help you

  
====================================
Frédéric BERNON 
HYMATOM SA 
Chef de projet informatique 
Microsoft Certified Professional 
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 
Email : address@hidden 
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr 
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
 


-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Andrew Lukefahr
Envoyé : mercredi 5 décembre 2007 05:31
? : Mailing list for lwIP users
Objet : [lwip-users] (no subject)


Hi,

I'm trying to use the sequential API to read and write to several sockets simultaneously.  I'm using FreeRTOS on an AT91SAM7X256 and a fairly recent(~1 month ago) cvs version of lwip.  I'm trying to read in data over several connections, parse out the useful data, and then send data back out over several other connections.  The incoming connections are only used for incoming data, and the outgoing connections are only used for outgoing data.  None of the streams have much data flowing though them, at most ~1KB/s.

I got it working pretty consistently with 3 incoming connections and 1-5 outgoing connections.  I found out I had to put a ~150ms delay on the output loop in my write thread, otherwise lwip would lock up.  However, now I need to add a fourth incoming connection.  With the addition of the 4th incoming connection, lwip works for anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes before locking up.  It seems the more outgoing connections that lwip is trying to service, the quicker the lockup, however, even if there aren't any outgoing connections, eventually lwip will still lock up.  I've been playing around with debugging, and so far I cant find anything that stands out.  The last few lines of my debug look like this...

LWIP:     tcp_receive: window update 1052
LWIP:     tcp_receive: dupack averted 77772192 77772083
LWIP:     tcp_receive: pcb->rttest 0 rtseq 6509 ackno 6510
... then there is a long pause, followed by....
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool TCPIP_MSG_INPKT
LWIP:     memp_malloc: out of memory in pool PBUF_POOL

So, a few questions.  First, I know that lwip isn't thread safe. 
However, I'm wondering what I need to control with a semaphore or mutex.  I've got 4 different recv functions in 4 different threads, and a single write thread.  So I can't block for each one, otherwise only one can be blocked in recv at a time, and it will have to timeout if there isnt any data, which will take too long. Also, do I need to try to serialize lwip if I'm only using each netconn for one directional data
flow?   (If each netconn is only being used for sending OR receiving,
not both )

Second, I assume that something is going wrong in netconn_recv().  I'm also guessing that as it works fine with three recv's, but locks up with four, it is mostly likely overwhelming a buffer with incoming data.  So, my question is what buffer(s) should I look at increasing to see if that helps?

Or is there something I'm missing?  Any debugging recommendations to help nail down whats causing the error?

I can post my lwipopts.h and and send/recv code if anyone thinks that will help.


Oh, and on a completely unrelated question, if FreeRTOS implements malloc and free as pvPortMalloc and vPortFree, what would I need to modify in lwip to get it to use FreeRTOS memory instead of its own?  I assume I would need to define MEM_LIBC_MALLOC correctly, and redefine mem_malloc and mem_free in mem.h?

Thanks


-- 
Andrew Lukefahr
address@hidden

Electrical and Computer Engineering
Univeristy of Missouri

Open Source, Open Minds



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]