[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?
From: |
Micael |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:48:08 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.15 |
On Tue, November 25, 2008 11:23, Piero 74 wrote:
> 2008/11/25 Kieran Mansley <address@hidden>
>> I'm not sure if you can put a listening socket in the
>> readable set and get notified when a new connection arrives either -
> yes... it's possible... i use it in my code... my task loop using a ..
> It works very well.
Thanks guys!
I understand that there are reasons for not supporting non-blocked io, but
are there any plans or work in progress regarding this? Or doesn't the
current infrastructure lend it self to this easily?
I guess it must have been discussed before. I saw some old posts about a
socket2.c?
I am now at the cross section with the sign saying Left "lwip" Right
"commercial IP stack". :)
If I choose lwip, I guess I will have to either do some implementation
outside the socket layer, or try to help the development of lwip in the
non-blocking way.
Background:
I like the socket api, because of its portability, and almost all my
designs are a bunch of nodes that has open connections to many other,
non-blocking is crucial for me. In this design, I would use lwip with
freertos.org on an NXP arm7tdmi.
Micael
- [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Micael, 2008/11/24
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Kieran Mansley, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Rishi Khan, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Kieran Mansley, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Micael, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Rishi Khan, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Kieran Mansley, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, address@hidden, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Jonathan Larmour, 2008/11/25
Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking?, Rishi Khan, 2008/11/25