[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem
|
From: |
Jonathan Larmour |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:47:08 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) |
bonny gijzen wrote:
> Wouldn't the code be better if the variables were initialised in the
> routines itself?
> I think a fancy C compiler will optimize it away ...
I doubt it.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine
- [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, yueyue papa, 2008/11/25
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/11/26
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, yueyue papa, 2008/11/26
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, Mike Williamson, 2008/11/26
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, yueyue papa, 2008/11/26
- RE: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, bonny gijzen, 2008/11/26
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem,
Jonathan Larmour <=
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, address@hidden, 2008/11/26
- Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, David Empson, 2008/11/26
- RE: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, Pettinato, Jim, 2008/11/26
Re: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem, Alain M., 2008/11/26