[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] bug report
From: |
robin |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] bug report |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:57:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1 |
<snip>
>> with a limited functionality, e.g. only %s, %u, %c, %d...
<snip>
>>
> Because we haven't got a common standard which printf-formatters are
> really portable and which aren't. And nearly no compiler warns about
> unportable printf-formatters when adding them to the code :-(
Is it practical for non-conforming implementations of printf to be proxied
- so part of the customization process when porting lwIP to your platform
would be to review a list of in-use format specifiers and then implement a
proxy which maps those to whatever your platform needs before calling your
own printf function.
Obviously this would require that your compiler supports varargs
processing and that you have a va_printf sort of function.
Just a suggestion.
Best wishes,
Robin Iddon
- [lwip-users] bug report, Martin Velek, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Jeff Barber, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] bug report, Bill Auerbach, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Martin Velek, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, address@hidden, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report,
robin <=
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Martin Velek, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, address@hidden, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/08
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Jeff Barber, 2010/03/05