[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?
From: |
Stephen Cleary |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:19:40 +0000 |
> Wow. It is on version 7.0.2 now ;o)
Yeah. Upgrading is definitely on my TODO list, but you know how it is - 10
different applications, original coder MIA, code is just not production-ready
even though it's in the field, constant feature requests and fire-fighting
prevent stabilization of the code base, etc, etc... :)
Ready for the funniest part?
I'm a .NET developer.
> Your SAM7 will be using ARM and optionally THUMB
> instructions, my target is using THUMB2, so even if we were using the
> same GCC compiler version the code gen would be different.
Righto - we're THUMB in everything except ISRs.
-Steve
- [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Richard Barry, 2011/11/20
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Enrico Murador - Research & Development - CET, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/11/24
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/11/24