[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler opt
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:51:52 +0000 |
On 24 Nov 2011, at 04:39, FreeRTOS Info wrote:
> The problem turned out to be in the library code called by my driver.
> The DMA code was using an incorrect index, causing the frame being
> written to a DMA buffer to overwrite the frame that was being
> transmitted by the DMA. That also explains the corruption I was seeing
> on the wire. Without optimisation the frame had already been transmitted.
Glad you have found your problem, and the explanation makes sense given the
symptoms you were seeing.
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, address@hidden, 2011/11/22
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/22
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Martin Velek, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Enrico Murador - Research & Development - CET, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/11/24