Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release

[Zayaz Volk]

I meant of course the total UDP datagram size, not the number of IP packets inside.

---

From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:45:23 +0000

Simon, I was talking about IPv4 fragmentation (and may be IP options). The document i read mentioned it is not implemented yet, but it seems the document is out of dated.
So now-days, is there any limitations on UDP/IPv4 implementation regarding the standard ?
How many IP fragments are supported in a single UDP ? up to 32K, 64K ?

Thanks,
Stas

---

Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:21:57 +0100
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release

Zayaz Volk wrote:

I am wondering, if there is a forecast for introducing fragmented udp support ?

IPv4 fragmentation and reassembly is already supported (since I don't know when). What are you missing?

Simon

_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users