Noam Weissman wrote:
> THANKS for pointing this out !!!.
> I am using the code I sent for several years and
was not aware of that :-(
I must say now I'm a little bit shocked. You already
pointed out lwIP
has threading requirements on this list more than once.
And still you've
got it wrong. What can we do to better document or
requirements? Really, I don't mean this offensive but I
really want to
get this solved better.
We could move the include files, prefix functions or add
Someone's *got* to do something about this ;-)
> The base code was taken from ST example !!
Well, obviously not them *g*
> I could not find netifapi_netif_set_link_up ... did
you mean netifapi_netif_set_up ?
That one is new to 2.0.1 (thanks to Joel).
lwip-users mailing list