[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re development vs. programming
From: |
Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim) |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re development vs. programming |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Nov 1996 11:22:19 -0500 (EST) |
On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Daniel Strychalski wrote:
> Drazen Kacar (address@hidden) wrote --
> > Now I need a clarification. Lynx runs on Unix and VMS. Both systems are
> supposed to have administrators. When I use the word 'installed' that
> means I made Lynx available to 8000 users. I'd use 'compiled' if it was
> on my private Linux (or whatever). Are you sure there is a large base
> of people who are not admins and who are trying to compile Lynx?
>...
> 2.4.2 binary. If I MENTION Lynx, the head admin makes clawing motions
> ("Windows is gonna getcha") and tells me to join the 'scapists....
>...
> The old distribution notes talked of installing Lynx (that is,
> uncompressing the binary) in one's home directory; evidently SOMEBODY
> thought this might be necessary for some people. Please, PLEASE make
> binaries available.
Should we set up directories on lynx.browser.org, or pointers to
directories, with Lynx binaries for different platforms? There are some
at UKans which would be a good start for this. Also, which verification
method (BETSI, PGP,...) would be good for verifying our original binaries
are properly delivered?
FWIW, I used "beav (binary editor and viewer)" to change the lynx.cfg
location in a generic binary to point to my home directory instead
of /usr/local/lib, but I doubt others would risk this.
Finally, how about some mutli-lingual help pages on l.b.o such as
http://lynx.browser.org/help/2.6/en/index.html
http://lynx.browser.org/help/2.6/de/index.html
...?
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;