Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process)

[Klaus Weide]

On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Nelson Henry Eric wrote:

> >     I'd consider merging to wwwlib5 as the highest priority.  It's
> > the biggest job on the list, I think, and will require major
> > restructuring of the Lynx code.  (For starters, can't we make all the
> > C code ANSI now, and forget about K&R C?)  Therefore, I think we
> 
> A hearty second to that motion!

How about just not requiring that *new* code uses those conventions /
macros?

Making such a change at a point where there are several experimental
development lines which have to be merged is a bad thing.  When/if there
is one stable, merged version, such a change could be made to *that*
(if it makes sense at all), so that new development could start from that
in several directions.

Don't make diff'ing harder than it has to be.

  Klaus


;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;