[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx
From: |
Andrew Kuchling |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 1998 11:18:08 -0500 (EST) |
Doug Kaufman <address@hidden> wrote:
>now works better than it ever has. In general, memory is not a problem.
>DJGPP creates protected mode programs that run using a DPMI manager. I
>think that the main DOS lynx problem now is the lack of a functioning
Ah... I was thinking of the problems of writing code that
would work on 286-class machines. DPMI programs require a 386 or
higher processor, right? So if we're already restricting the port to
386 or higher, then maintaining a DOS port isn't that much of a
problem; you'd have lots of memory, 32-bit code, etc.
Andrew Kuchling
address@hidden
http://starship.skyport.net/crew/amk/
- LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Tim Pierce, 1998/01/04
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, T.E.Dickey, 1998/01/04
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/01/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Andrew Kuchling, 1998/01/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/01/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Matt Ackeret, 1998/01/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Doug Kaufman, 1998/01/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/01/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx,
Andrew Kuchling <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Doug Kaufman, 1998/01/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Doug Kaufman, 1998/01/07
Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx, Matt Ackeret, 1998/01/04