RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems

[Eric Anderson]

If it's something that would give greater flexibility in controlling
keys in lynx then it would be well received, I should think. With the
variety of unix terminals in use, something needs be done to make
keymapping easier.
ANything that can make lynx interpret ^[[154q as PGUP (and the rest of
the funky codes) would be most welcome, by me at least!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [SMTP:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 1998 1:41 PM
> To:   address@hidden
> Subject:      Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, it appears that the current mechanism in lynx is to
> make
> single byte codes to special functions.  I see no way to specify
> terminfo
> variable names in the KEY_MAP variables of the lynx.cfg file.
> 
> Is this something that would be useful?  It seems like, with that
> facility,
> then the request about specialized function key mapping would be less
> painful.
> -- 
> Larry W. Virden                 INET: address@hidden
> <URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
> Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting
> should 
> be construed as representing my employer's opinions.