[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8)
From: |
Wayne Buttles |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8) |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 1998 11:45:07 -0500 (EST) |
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Philip Webb wrote:
> so shouldn't the Lynx development co-operative, as an international effort
> working by consensus, find a way for the SSL hooks to be freely available
> from some site outside the USA, if possible?
Who prosecutes cases of munitions export? Is there actually a human I can
ask if distributing lynx w/ssl is ok?
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/09
- LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Philip Webb, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8),
Wayne Buttles <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Mark H. Wood, 1998/03/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/03/10
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Matt Ackeret, 1998/03/09
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), David Woolley, 1998/03/11
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (hooks are munitions?), Al Gilman, 1998/03/10
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), David Woolley, 1998/03/11
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, Personal, 1998/03/09
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/11