[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping
|
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 Apr 1998 07:12:03 -0400 (EDT) |
> What is the problem with remapping the function keys?
most of the logic that supports function-keys is a switch-statement,
rather than a table. A table could be extended, in principle, and
its entries (more) easily reassigned.
> Kristin McNally
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- LYNX-DEV Key re-mapping, Kristin McNally, 1998/04/07
- LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, Kristin McNally, 1998/04/07
- RE: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, Eric Anderson, 1998/04/07
- RE: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, John E. Davis, 1998/04/07
- RE: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, Eric Anderson, 1998/04/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, John E. Davis, 1998/04/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, Kristin McNally, 1998/04/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV key re-mapping,
T.E.Dickey <=