[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Apr 1998 15:44:43 -0400 (EDT) |
to follow up on what T.E.Dickey said:
> > One potential danger is that what doesn't get distributed doesn't
> > get used, and falls out of sync quietly so that you don't fix it
> > and when you do need it, it doesn't work.
> yes - but if we do the gettext (or whatever) integration properly, those
> extra files are just data, like
>
> 00001 Hello world
> 00002 Do you wish to quit
>
> (and once assigned, we _don't_ change the numbers).
What is your opinion of
A: opaque irrevokable integers as above and vector retrieval
(code not mnemonic)
B: sorta-English message names as at present and
hash the access of the translations. (program biased
to U.S. English base, OtherLanguages 2nd class).
C: mnemonic+integer message names. (long names)
(integer extract plus vector access for retrieve)
??
Al
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/04/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/04/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Karl Eichwalder, 1998/04/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/04/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation,
Al Gilman <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Claude SOMA - CNTS, 1998/04/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, Claude SOMA - CNTS, 1998/04/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYMessages_en.h translation, James Spath, 1998/04/09