[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx.cfg
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx.cfg |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 05:18:57 -0400 (EDT) |
> Since we're now using configure (last time I played with Lynx, Fote was
> still in charge, and he seemed against it at the time), shouldn't we follow
> the guidelines that go along with it?
>
> To that end, wouldn't lynx.cfg be considered an architecture independent
> data file, and therefore end up in ${prefix}/share rather than lib?
I had left it in ${prefix}/lib since that would have been an (imho) unnecessary
change. But it's simple to change (if there's enough acceptance).
> Actually, I would prefer share/lynx, but I'm not sure how that fits into
> the Grand Scheme Of Things (tm).
for one file only - probably not a lot (except that the help-files also
are platform-independent).
> But at the least, it, and all the help files and what not should be moved
> out of lib and into share.
>
> mrc
> --
> Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
> address@hidden and be right all the time, or not work at all
> www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
> We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey