[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default
From: |
Doug Kaufman |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Aug 1998 20:16:36 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Philip Webb wrote:
> given that we have to rely on a configure switch --enable-nsl-fork
> to stop a look-up with `z', why is the default disable?
> shouldn't it be enable?
Not all operating systems allow this. MSDOS, for example, doesn't allow
forking. No one has yet written alternative code for lynx that allows
these actions in MSDOS.
Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Internet: address@hidden (preferred)
address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), dickey, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Philip Webb, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), brian j. pardy, 1998/08/21
- lynx-dev nsl-fork documentation (patch), Philip Webb, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Philip Webb, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Eric, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default,
Doug Kaufman <=
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Philip Webb, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Al Gilman, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, pg, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Philip Webb, 1998/08/21