[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev br (ok, it's tiny)
From: |
brian j. pardy |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev br (ok, it's tiny) |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Aug 1998 13:26:36 -0700 |
Mike Castle wrote:
> Amazingly enough address@hidden said:
> > the vital thing is to make non-collapsing (however defined) the default,
> > for the benefit of all those ordinary users
>
> I'm afraid I have to disagree. (I missed most of the original discussion
> on this :-).
[snip]
> We should always default to correct handling of the standard, then allow
> the users alternative ways of handling it.
This is my opinion as well. Standards exist to be followed, anything that
would lead people to be lazy and ignore the standard isn't a good thing,
IMO.
--
Mate, this parrot wouldn't VOOM if you put four million volts through it!
-- Monty Python
Re: lynx-dev br (ok, it's tiny), Mike Castle, 1998/08/30
- Re: lynx-dev br (ok, it's tiny),
brian j. pardy <=