lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Update for djgpp + _fmode


From: Leonid Pauzner
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Update for djgpp + _fmode
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:52:22 +0400 (MSD)

The right thing should be moving SetFmode inside the function LYNewTxtFile()
(and probably LYAppendToTxtFile()) and closing the discussion.


>      * From: "Gisle Vanem" <address@hidden>
> address@hidden said:

>> > You mean ";". Yes, Borland warn about that, but can be switched off.
>> is that a separate error, or part of the error-level?  (I'd rather stick
>> with the empty semicolon -- or else we can add a magic symbol such as
>> LY_EMPTY_STATEMENT to cover both cases...)

> To correct my earlier statement; Borland only warns if an empty macro is
> used together with e.g. an if-statement. Like:

>   main()
>   {
>     if (a == b)
>        SetFmode();
>   }

> Gives warning `Code has no effect in function main' for the if-statement.
> The Borland optimizer won't strip the if-statement though, but gcc 2.7.2
> does (even with -O1).

> The warning can be switched off with `#pragma warn -eff' or cmd-line
> switch `-w-eff'.

> Defining SetFmode() as `((void)0)' doesn't produce any warning.

> Gisle V.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]