[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related)

From: Nelson Henry Eric
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:15:38 +0900 (JST)

> this will be the address from userdefs.h. Neither the individual user
> nor a system administrator needs to keep lynx.cfg at this location,
> however. If lynx.cfg is at another location, the current code will not
> find it. "lynx_cfg_file", however, ALWAYS points to the configuration
> file currently being used, which should have all the comments and
> any links to included files. I won't (and I suspect most users and
> administrators won't) keep a duplicate copy of lynx.cfg just for the
> help system to find. If the worry is that the active file will be
> shortened to only the items that are different from the compilation
> option, it is easier to specify in the INSTALLATION instructions that
> the file should not be shortened because it is also a help file, than
> to ask that a duplicate file be kept at a hardcoded help location.

I just wanted to second this.  (I'm afraid my reply was not very well written.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]