[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches (long)
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches (long) |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Nov 1998 22:25:59 -0500 (EST) |
> There are patches for these and some other problems below. (I am sure
> there are more leaks.)
thanks. I'm about 1/4 through putting together a patch for dev.3 (this
is larger than any of the chunks that I have in my queue).
> In LYCharUtils.c there is a comment:
>
> /*
> * FIXME: something's wrong with the limit checks here (clearing the
> * buffer helps).
> */
> memset(replace_buf, 0, sizeof(replace_buf));
>
> Is there any known test case to reproduce the problem?
Laura Eaves had one - I don't know if it's still available.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches (long), (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches (long), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/11/15
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches, Klaus Weide, 1998/11/16
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/11/16
- lynx-dev on caching (long), Klaus Weide, 1998/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev on caching (long), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/11/17
- lynx-dev partial display (was: on caching), Klaus Weide, 1998/11/18
- Re: lynx-dev partial display (was: on caching), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/11/18
- Re: lynx-dev partial display (was: on caching), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/11/18
- Re: lynx-dev partial display (was: on caching), Klaus Weide, 1998/11/18
- Re: lynx-dev on caching (long), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/11/24
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1rel.2 patches (long),
dickey <=