[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem
From: |
Clair Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:27:45 -0500 (EST) |
Klaus
Yes, I used -trace
Thank You
Mr. Clair Wilson
Internet Administrator
Mainframe System Programmer
Information Services
Robert Packer Hospital
Sayre, Pa.
address@hidden
phone 717-882-5389
fax 717-882-5330
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Clair Wilson wrote:
>
> > I changed shells from mshell to ksh and tried lynx again. This time I got
> > another error line which I had never gotten previously under mshell.
> >
> > The error lines are as follows :
> >
> > TP: Unable to connect to remote host for `http://lynx.browser.org/' (errno=9
> >
> > Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
> >
> >
> > I had never seen the errno=9 before.
> >
> > Do you have any idea what the errno=9 means ? I don't know where to look
> > for an explanation. Do you think this might help?
>
> Yes it helps, but I don't really understand what you did to get that
> message. Normally it should only appear (probably in a Lynx.trace file)
> when you run with -trace or turn tracing on with ^T. Is that what you
> did?
>
> I don't know what mshell is/does; either for some reason it doesn't
> let you see all the same output, or maybe you are running a different
> copy of lynx (if there is more than one) because the search path is
> different? What version are you using? Is it compliled in some
> unusal way? Maybe with SOCKS support? What version are you using
> again?
>
> Did you compile lynx yourself? Did you try to recompile?
>
> The is a system dependent error number; you should hunt for its
> definition in the system C header file /usr/include/errno.h or one of
> the files #include'd by it.
>
> On my linux system it is defined as
> #define EBADF 9 /* Bad file number */
> in /usr/include/asm/errno.h, but that could be different for AIX.
>
> I would like to help figure out what goes wrong, but we need more
> info from you, or someone else who can reproduce the problem.
> Try to generate a Lynx.trace file and send it to the list; better
> too much than too little info.
>
> Klaus
>
>
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- lynx-dev "new anchor" message, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- lynx-dev Re: "new anchor" message, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/02
- lynx-dev Re: "new anchor" message, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: "new anchor" message, Philip Webb, 1999/02/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, pg, 1999/02/01