[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching
From: |
Scott Bigham |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:49:42 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 address@hidden wrote:
[I wrote, discussing "#define atexit(func) /* nothing */"]
> > Eek! That's almost certainly a bad idea.
> no - only on MSDOS is it a bad idea (good idea on Unix and VMS, since
> allocated memory is returned on exit from a process).
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of someone in the future
trying to install an atexit function that does something besides release
memory, not knowing he was being undercut. I dunno, call me paranoid,
but this just has "disaster waiting to happen" written all over it.
-sbigham
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/11
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/11
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/11
lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching ("raw_mode" patch), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, dickey, 1999/04/11
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, dickey, 1999/04/11