[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2???
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2??? |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 1999 08:04:21 -0400 (EDT) |
> > > (if it were really automatic, there'd not be the spelling errors
> > > scattered
> > > through the html'ized version, which I corrected in my resync patch, but
> > > are not reflected in Vlad's version ;-)
> >
> > Hmm, perhaps you right ;-)
> > He have done several changes but I have not looked so close as you does.
>
> Please, point some of them. Seems that I made very few modifications (~5)
Auxiliary is misspelled Auxilary.
-- each time I find (or am told about) a problem, I look for other occurrences,
e.g., run ispell on the whole file. Usually it's not the only occurrence.
-- on the whole, the idea is good (most of us agree to that). But I'd
prefer generating the two forms from a single file (perhaps markup
the original lynx.cfg transparently). Now that 2.8.2 is 'official',
I'll start reviewing your patch.
> to make the description clearer (from my POV) and to make text structure more
>
> suitable for htmlization (if I made grammar error in the phrase
> 'in configuration file', then it can be fixed in a second - it's generated by
> the macro).
>
> Anyway, I done conversion in ~8 hours of one day, so I was so tired to make
> spelling errors.
yes - that's my point. it's a lot of work to do and keep in sync.
> I'll place body.in and the patch to my homepage soon and will announce
> lynx-dev about location.
thanks.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2???, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2???,
dickey <=
Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2???, Henry Nelson, 1999/06/04
Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2???, Henry Nelson, 1999/06/04