[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev bug report
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev bug report |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jul 1999 07:15:45 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Frederic L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> > "Leonid Pauzner" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > >What version does '=' Info Page show?
> > >(perhaps they have not changed internal version number, just set rpm
> > >package
> > >name?).
> >
> > Sorry but I have no idea. I'm using RedHat 5.1. It shipped with a very old
> > Lynx version (compiled with Slang 0.99.X!). I don't think they changed the
> > internal version number. At least not in my old Lynx version, deleted one
> > year ago.
> >
>
> The lynx-2.8.1-11.rpm is shipped with RH 6.0.
>
> '=' page shows 'Lynx 2.8.1rel.2'.
So what we have to guess with is that someone's applied 11 patches to the
2.8.1 release version (the rpm should have the patches of course - they
should include the post-release patches we have in the release directory,
since verbose images is broken otherwise).
> Best regards,
> -Vlad
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/22
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Frederic L. W. Meunier, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Frederic L. W. Meunier, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Frederic L. W. Meunier, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report,
T.E.Dickey <=