[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:03:11 -0600 (CST) |
> > Lynx is GPL'd:
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, David Woolley wrote:
>
> He can also charge for the source, based on the cost of making and
> sending the copy, but not based on the value of the source itself.
In which sense do you mean "He can"?
1) he is allowed to
2) something else (e.g.: would likely get away with; or: would make a
reasonable business decision if he did...)
If 1), I don't think there is anything to forbid charging for the source
"based on the value of the source itself". Whatever that [value of the
source itself] means. If you disagree, please show where it's written.
Klaus
- lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, TWG, 1999/12/16
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, T.E.Dickey, 1999/12/16
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, David Woolley, 1999/12/18
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version,
Klaus Weide <=
- [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], brian j pardy, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], Klaus Weide, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], brian j pardy, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], Klaus Weide, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], brian j pardy, 1999/12/18
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, David Woolley, 1999/12/20
Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, David Woolley, 1999/12/18