[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem]
From: |
Hataguchi Takeshi |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem] |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Dec 1999 22:55:53 +0900 (JST) |
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:
> > I can't understand why you wrote "it is best done outside of Lynx".
>
> It's the "Lynx way," as I see it. A lynx, as you know, is a small
> wild cat. We tend to associate the characteristics of lighting speed
> and elusiveness with that animal. As we continue to load up Lynx
> with functions peripheral to a client's access and use of Web resources,
> such as proxying and word processing, it begins to look more and more
> like an over-fed tabby.
I see your (and probably lynx-dev's) general thought.
But I can't understand the individual functions which should be
inside of Lynx or outside of it.
Are you saying processing 1-byte kana should be outside of Lynx?
Is this right?
--
Takeshi Hataguchi
E-mail: address@hidden
- lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Henry Nelson, 1999/12/22
- lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Hataguchi Takeshi, 1999/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Henry Nelson, 1999/12/23
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem],
Hataguchi Takeshi <=
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Henry Nelson, 1999/12/26
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Henry Nelson, 1999/12/27
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Hataguchi Takeshi, 1999/12/28
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Henry Nelson, 1999/12/29
- Re: lynx-dev reading sjis docs [was Re: lynxcgi problem], Hataguchi Takeshi, 1999/12/29