[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.5
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.5 |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:58:00 -0400 (EDT) |
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 address@hidden wrote:
> I didn't get it. Is everything in the archive? If not, I'd appreciate a
> repost of anything that's missing.
I haven't seen it yet, either. iirc, we've had a couple of times where
I post the changes late on Sunday and it doesn't propagate very quickly.
> * add os390 item to $host_os case-statement in configure.in -PG
>
> Thanks. But I don't see this reflected in configure. Did you run autoconf?
duh - no. I was up too late, I see (sorry).
> * move $host_os case-statement in configure.in before some configuration
> tests
> such as CF_BUNDLED_INTL which might perform compile-time tests -TD
>
> Again, thanks. But I fear this is insufficient. Since the case branch sets
> the
> default name of the compiler to "c89" instead of "cc", it must be performed
> before AC_PROG_CC. The MKS patches actually modify AC_PROG_CC to search for
> "c89" before "cc". This is good POSIX/XOpen.
ok - I'll have to revisit this, then. This is the only one where you want
to force the compiler to be different; probably I should put c89 into the
AC_PROG_CC macro's search list (though thinking about it, I can recall
that introduces problems with some platforms - using c89 would preset
definitions that broke the POSIX headers)
> -- gil
>
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden