[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:50:58 +0900 (JST) |
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 01:36:49PM +0900, Henry Nelson wrote:
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 842 Jan 6 2000 es.po
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 3296 Sep 13 1999 it.po
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 261 Jan 6 2000 ko.po
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 261 Jan 6 2000 no.po
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 261 Jan 6 2000 pl.po
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 826 Jan 6 2000 pt.po
> >
> > None of these are valid *.po files, and IMO should be removed.
>
> they're all valid (that only requires that they be compilable), but if you
> read
> the changes for dev.15, you would notice that they're not in the source
> anymore
1) Of course to see what the "changes for dev.15" really mean, you'd have
to download the "source." Over this admittedly slow connection it now
takes at least 30 minutes longer than before. The usual advice is
"use the patch." This particular one would take more than an hour to
download from here.
1875794 Dec 21 18:44 [10]lynx2.8.4dev.15.tar.bz2
1657328 Nov 3 01:44 [14]lynx2.8.4dev.14.tar.bz2
437204 Dec 21 18:49 [16]2.8.4dev.15.patch.gz
2) What was _done_ was NOT what was discussed on the list. Both Morten
Bo Johansen and I agreed that the complete *.po files should only go
into _releases_, not into the development bundles. The "beef" about
stub files was that "invalid" (by anyone's definition) ones were being
included. We also discussed that IF the complete *.po files were
included, they should only go in the releases, most certainly not in
the development source.
3) "Valid" to you may mean "compilable", but to the user those files,
which, by the way, remain in the sources, are less than valid. To
the user they are not only useless and meaningless, they only serve
to create confusion as to what is available.
4) What is being requested is that es.po, it.po, ko.po, no.po, pl.po
and pt.po be removed from the po/ directory, and that stub files
be included (not the whole *.po files) for cs.po, da.po, de.po,
fr.po, nl.po, pt_BR.po, ru.po, sl.po, sv.po AND ja.po, AND for
any other "valid" *.po files that are out there.
__Henry
Listing of po/ from a fresh breakout of lynx2.8.4dev.15.tar.bz2:
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 894 Apr 3 2000 POTFILES.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 162595 Dec 22 11:44 cs.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 165662 Dec 22 11:44 da.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 173910 Dec 22 11:44 de.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 842 Jan 7 2000 es.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 155024 Dec 22 11:44 fr.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 3296 Sep 14 1999 it.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 261 Jan 7 2000 ko.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 112901 Dec 22 11:44 lynx.pot
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 6912 Jul 17 12:16 makefile.inn
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 169604 Dec 22 11:44 nl.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 261 Jan 7 2000 no.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 261 Jan 7 2000 pl.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 826 Jan 7 2000 pt.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 165622 Dec 22 11:44 pt_BR.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 764 Sep 14 1999 readme
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 167839 Dec 22 11:44 ru.po
-r--r--r-- 1 user 133360 Dec 22 11:44 sl.po
-rw-r--r-- 1 user 163128 Dec 22 11:44 sv.po
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Thomas Dickey, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, pg, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Thomas Dickey, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4 & SSL, Philip Webb, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4 & SSL, Thomas Dickey, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4 & cookie b/f, Philip Webb, 2000/12/22
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Atsuhito Kohda, 2000/12/22
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/25
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15,
Henry Nelson <=
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28