[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Has anyone considered partial java script implementation?
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Has anyone considered partial java script implementation? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:15:18 +0900 (JST) |
FAQ # 10,121. (Just about everybody.)
> I don't know java script well enough to answer this, but I see examples of
> javascript calls that are basically rewrites of html links, and I think
> there may be a limited subset of javascript that is html in disguise and
> could cover enough cases to make its inclusion in lynx a very good idea.
Rather than stuff more "limited subset" garbage into Lynx, why not write
a Lynx-friendly proxy routine?
__Henry
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Has anyone considered partial java script implementation?,
Henry Nelson <=