Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?

[Matt Ackeret]

On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Rob Partington wrote:

>Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:10:43 +0000
>From: Rob Partington <address@hidden>
>Reply-To: address@hidden
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?
>
>In message <address@hidden>,
>Harland Christofferson <address@hidden> writes:
>> I had intended to start working on it with an older version of
>> Lynx late last year between contract gigs. A new gig came up and
>> I have not had the time to get back into it. I am willing to
>> start on it again. Help is welcome. There doesn't seem to be
>> much interest in JS support as far as I can tell, however.
>
>Look for my messages on the topic in the archives.  I've already done
>a fair amount of work on this and, in my humble opinion, it's pointless
>without a total rewrite of Lynx's internals.  If you're going to do that,
>though, you might as well start from a more sensible starting position
>like w3m or gecko.

or links?  links already does some pages "prettier" than w3m.


; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden