[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:58:06 +0900 (JST) |
> missing ones are rather important, e.g. suspend, shell, file_url etc.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NEVER give a shell environment of ANY kind to an anonymous user of Lynx.
An attempt by an anonymous user to suspend or go to shell should kick
the user off of the system (end the telnet session). It's been a while,
but I don't remember Lynx even honoring "!" by the anonymous user other
than to say SPAWNING_DISABLED.
__Henry
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Bela Lubkin, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Henry Nelson, 2002/09/09
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Henry Nelson, 2002/09/09
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?,
Henry Nelson <=
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Henry Nelson, 2002/09/09
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Henry Nelson, 2002/09/09