[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Dillo
From: |
Clemens Fischer |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Dillo |
Date: |
26 Sep 2002 22:12:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) |
Petr Baudis <address@hidden> writes:
> You would be maybe surprised, but the "JavaScript required everywhere" popular
> belief is not true from a large part. In fact, most of the sites are perfectly
> functional without JavaScript and if they use it, frequently only for
> additional eyecandy or convience. Sure there are places where it's a no-go
... the reason beeing propably because javascript isn't the same
across platforms and browsers. it seems it is used mainly to provide
fancy buttons to pick some help-URL or popup commercials when the
mouse hovers over something.
maybe it is much easier for the site-designer to provide alternatives
for non-script parts to restrict js like that. this in turn should
encourage us to complain if some site is inaccessible for
text-browsers. so we should complain always about this type of
unneccessary javascript!
clemens
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Dillo, Philip Webb, 2002/09/24
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2002/09/25
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Philip Webb, 2002/09/25
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Petr Baudis, 2002/09/26
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo,
Clemens Fischer <=
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Philip Webb, 2002/09/27
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Petr Baudis, 2002/09/27
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Philip Webb, 2002/09/27
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Petr Baudis, 2002/09/27
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/27
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/27
- Re: lynx-dev Dillo, David Woolley, 2002/09/28