[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone

From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:32:20 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Todd Vierling wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Thomas Dickey wrote:

(In more recent version branches of NetBSD and other OS's, system .h files
have become progrssively more strict about standards conformance.

There must be something nice I could find to say about NetBSD's header,
but offhand, all I can recall are their problems (incomplete,

Hm, can you say "standards conformance" again?

sure can.  utmpx/utmp, wide-character, crud in the header files marked
to-be-done. But I'm wasting my time - if you knew what I was talking about, you'd be a little more graceful about it.

Please keep your (likely Linux-advocacy based) flamebait at home.  The rest

rofl - awai

no (and I'm not a Nazi either - to save you the inevitable knee-jerk reaction).

of us are working with third party software quite successfully on NetBSD,
and it's unfortunate that you feel the need to have an unfounded temper
tantrum about it.

Perhaps I'm just tired of explaining to people why NetBSD's header files
are a nuisance to work around.

Thomas E. Dickey

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]