[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Is this a bug ?
|
From: |
David Woolley |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Is this a bug ? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:06:14 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) |
wrote:
Lynx uses all the link-characters and the link seems bad; Firefox
discards the encoded space and the link seems good. Which is right?
  should be ignored in URLs, as it should have been resolved before
the parameter is treated as a URL, and true whitespace is ignored, as it
would be ambiguous in printed URLs. %20 should be treated as
significant in URLs.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.