[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more built-in functions, make shell
From: |
Earnie Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: more built-in functions, make shell |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:35:54 +0000 |
On 3:58:06 pm 2005-07-03 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:41:08 +0000
> > From: "Earnie Boyd" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> >
> > I see the benefits but I don't know if the benefits outway the
> > headaches it might cause.
>
> What headaches are those? If the implementation is compatible with
> Bourne shell, it will work as if you had a shell installed. I don't
> see any headaches here.
I'm thinking of all the code that is specialized to Cygwin and MSYS I
suppose. Things that handle \r\n when the file is open in binary mode and
this or that. If it is a configurable option then I have no problem with
it. Or perhaps filtered to #if _WIN32.
Earnie
- more built-in functions, make shell, Jonathan Baccash, 2005/07/02
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Earnie Boyd, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Earnie Boyd, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell,
Earnie Boyd <=
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Paul D. Smith, 2005/07/03