make-w32
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunte


From: Angelo Graziosi
Subject: Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch for gnu make)]
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:30:42 +0200 (MET DST)


On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:51:54 -0400
> > From: "William A. Hoffman" <address@hidden>
> > 
> > I have re-built and this time config.h has the right PATH_SEPARATOR:
> > 
> > /* Define to the character that separates directories in PATH. */
> > #define PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR ':'
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > All tests still pass. I have updated the make.exe on the ftp site as well. 
> > 
> > The correct date on the file is here:
> > -rwxr-xr-x  1 kitware kitware 494678 Oct  5 08:44 make.exe
> 
> Angelo, could you please download this new binary and try building
> GFortran with it?

(The mailer has problems with "William
A. Hoffman" <address@hidden>,  I must cut it from CC and resend
the message)


I have downloaded http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe (20061005
14:44) and with that I have done a quick test:

    $ cd ~/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc
    $ make -p --debug=i -f cygdos-test.mk 2>&1 | tee
      ../../../cygdos-new-test-patched-2.log 

The log is attached. It looks to me OK.

Now I will try a new GFortran (with the same source) build until, at
least, the critical point, posting you the results.


Cheers

   Angelo.


> 
> > Is there a test I can run?
> 
> Any Makefile that uses VPATH or vpath with two or more directories
> separated by colons should do.  "make -p" should show the VPATH value
> (provided that the directories mentioned in it actually exist); your
> previous build of Make didn't show those values because it failed to
> break the list into individual directories, and the check that the
> directory exists failed.
> 

Attachment: cygdos-new-test-patched-2.log
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]