[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript

From: Laura Arjona
Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:06:39 +0100

2013/11/12  <address@hidden>:
> That is not true? That the developers should test the code with LibreJS
> before releasing it? If LibreJS has a defect, they should notify the
> developers of LibreJS I would think. If LibreJS is fine, then the new
> conventions should be followed. In the meantime, i would avoid taking the
> survey.

Oh, sorry, I missunderstood. You mean the survey itself...
It's managed by Limesurvey, ( which is licensed under
GPL v2. We didn't add any additional code.
I'll pass myself the tests and will report the problems upstream.
Thanks for your interest!
Laura Arjona

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joar Wandborg [mailto:address@hidden] On Behalf Of Joar Wandborg
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:39 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript
> On 11/12/2013 07:33 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>> Can the developer do their own testing with LibreJS to make sure
> beforehand
>> that their code will not be blocked?   *If LibreJS is blocking something,
> it
>> is likely non free.*
> Regarding the above emphasized sentence: That is simply not true, LibreJS
> requires some brand-new commenting conventions that previously have not been
> necessary to designate make a JavaScript file free.
> All of our JavaScript and code is released under OSI-approved licenses,
> LibreJS is simply not clever enough to detect it at the moment.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]