[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VAL
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:33:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+ |
I've attached a patch for a less conservative transformation, which
also handles sequences in operator positions. (Like the previous
patch, it is only lightly tested.) I believe it still preserves
semantics, but it commits to a particular order of evaluation.
compound-operator.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, (continued)
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/20
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/21
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/21
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES,
Taylor R Campbell <=