AW: AW: AW: [Mldonkey-users] Re: AW: re[7]:

[Alexander Gräf]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Lionel Bouton [mailto:address@hidden 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2005 10:05
> An: Alexander Gräf
> Cc: address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Mldonkey-users] Re: AW: re[7]:
> 
> Your other arguments made sense, you only hurt your 
> credibility with this last one: although my usual MUA is 
> Thunderbird I sometimes use console mail programs where it 
> makes sense (for some special purposes the capabilities of 
> graphical MUAs are very far from the ones of some console 
> MUAs). I don't know many blind people who use graphical MUAs either...

When designing webpages, I take a lot work only for making them completly 
Java-Script free, and test them in Links (console browser). However, I cannot 
understand people who have their full vision abilities, but are using a console 
reader anyway (there are rare occasions when this would be needed). That is soo 
1998 ... And some of the arguments pointed out by the auther are the same, too.

> For the Reply-To, one problem I didn't see mentionned yet is 
> when a user sets the Reply-To header for its own purpose. I 
> regularly do so (not on mldonkey-users though) and I wouldn't 
> like it being replaced by the mailling-list manager without 
> me having any control on it.

It wont have any benefit, because the mailing list software will still send 
messages to your primary address, with which you have subscribed. But because 
this was decided long ago, there is no point in further debating about that.

Cheers