|
From: | Matthew A. Nicholson |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] [from svn list] Case study: Mono switches to Subversion |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:53:02 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:17:43 -0600, "Matthew A. Nicholson" <address@hidden> said: matt> Bruce Stephens wrote: matt> > <http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=83672>matt> matt> How would monotone fare in such a situation?Considering the stubornness of some people in the GNOME project (as I understand it from the message you point at), monotone would probably not go at all, primarly because there's no 'blame'/'annotate' and secondly because there's absolutely no support for committing single files unless you want to make the effort to commit between every changed file, which I think would be really stupid, at the very least.
Most certianly. I would not expect them to switch (plus I don't think monotone is ready yet). Just wondering how we would fare. Now seeing as there is not blame/annotate, can't this information be gathered from the certs?
However, it may be that monotone's off-line features are cool enough for people to get their act together to change their habits. It certainly did for me.
Yeah, I find monotone great for even managing a project on which I am the only developer. I nolonger have to worry about breaking something and not being able to fix it. :)
-- Matthew A. Nicholson Matt-land.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |