[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] package_full_revision.txt and derived files
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] package_full_revision.txt and derived files |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:03:52 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:29:13PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> The problem lies in the dependencies, not in the tool.
>
> package_full_revision.txt is currently regarded as a .PHONY, which is
> the reason it gets constantly rebuilt. Is there a reason it can't
> depend on MT/revision?
Yes. The point of package_full_revision is that it also lists
uncommitted changes, so that one can tell whether the binary actually
is the one that MT/revision would suggest. There's no way to do this
except by running 'monotone status' on each and every build...
-- Nathaniel
--
Civil rights were not compatible with European unification. But I'm much
happier now that all our strawberries are the same size. -- dark
Re: [Monotone-devel] package_full_revision.txt and derived files, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/01/19
Re: [Monotone-devel] package_full_revision.txt and derived files,
Nathaniel Smith <=
[Monotone-devel] Re: package_full_revision.txt and derived files, Bruce Stephens, 2005/01/19
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: package_full_revision.txt and derived files, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/01/19