[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Weird merge result in monotone.command-specific-options
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Weird merge result in monotone.command-specific-options... |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:27:31 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi,
in the branch net.venge.monotone.command-specific-options, something
weird happened during the last propagate from net.venge.monotone. If
you look at the result (3df2e1d76aec27a233d09e92ba70df26f1dddc66), you
will see that it looks like both tests/t_update_inodeprints.at and
tests/t_refresh_inodeprints.at are added, each coming from one parent
revision.
The thing is, however, that one of the parent revisions
(e5b9010f189dc4e46892c3f5050db0b59f67aeb9) actually contains a rename
from tests/t_update_inodeprints.at to tests/t_refresh_inodeprints.at.
This seems to be completely ignored in the merge!
I'm guessing the merging algorithm lost track of the sequence of
events, so instead of having the sequence "file added; file renamed",
it seems to assume that the sequence of events is "file added; file
rename; another file with the same name added".
I'm not sure I understand the intricaties of the merge algorithm
enough to even start to figure this one out...
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Monotone-devel] Weird merge result in monotone.command-specific-options...,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <=