Re: [Monotone-devel] multiple (3+) ancestors

[Markus Schiltknecht]

Hi,

Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I have *no idea* what this means.  Not only can I not tell whether
> N-parent revisions are a sensible solution to your problem, I can't
> even figure out what the problem is or whether it needs a solution.

Speaking with the monotone tongue on: CVS allows you to create tags on 
multiple revisions, like "oh, I'm tagging foo from revision 5a324.. and 
bar from 9473..".  Likewise for branches :-(

As does subversion...

> [I am not very sympathetic to the desire to mimic arbitrarily broken
> CVS history graphs in monotone.]

Limiting monotone to only two ancestors per revision seems likely 
arbitrarily.

Regards

Markus